<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>LogoDesign.org &#187; banned</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.logodesign.org/tag/banned/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.logodesign.org</link>
	<description>Logo Design Inspiration and Ideas</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 15:37:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Photoshopped Ads Banned In England</title>
		<link>http://www.logodesign.org/2009/12/22/photoshopped-ads-banned-in-england/</link>
		<comments>http://www.logodesign.org/2009/12/22/photoshopped-ads-banned-in-england/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 15:40:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>George Ryan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Everything Else]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[banned]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photoshop]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logodesign.org/?p=337</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Using Photoshop in your graphic design efforts? Careful - In some areas it may be a controlled substance!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When the model &#8220;<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twiggy">Twiggy</a>&#8221; appeared in a series of Olay ads looking much younger than her 59 years, and claiming that the product she was advertising, &#8220;Definitely Eye Cream&#8221;, was responsible for the changes, people started crying foul.</p>
<p>Turn out that in addition to adding the phrases &#8220;Olay is my secret to brighter-looking eyes&#8221; and &#8220;Because younger-looking eyes never go out of fashion&#8230;[it] reduces the look of wrinkles and dark circles for brighter, younger-looking eyes.&#8221; to the ad, the artists at Olay also did some &#8220;minor retouching&#8221; of the skin around Twiggy&#8217;s face, in effect creating the very same changes that the product was supposed to be responsible for.</p>
<p>According to the Guardian, the U.K&#8217;s Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) received hundreds of complaints from the public, claiming the Olay images were &#8220;socially irresponsible&#8221; and could have a &#8220;negative impact on people&#8217;s perceptions of their own body image&#8221;.</p>
<p>After much deliberation the ASA came to the conclusion that the ads should be banned, stating that altering the image gave a &#8220;misleading impression of the effect the product could achieve.&#8221;</p>
<p>Photoshop: helping to sell the snake oil of the 21st century.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.logodesign.org/2009/12/22/photoshopped-ads-banned-in-england/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
